The primary disadvantage of geographic departmentalization is that it has led to the establishment of two separate departments. The Department of Agriculture, Environment, and Natural Resources (DAENR) has the responsibility of managing agriculture in the United States, whereas its counterpart, the Department of Economic Development and Community Development (DEDCD), has the responsibility of managing the economy.
There are a LOT of departments in the US government. There are a LOT more than there are people. So if a departmentalization scheme is adopted by the federal government, then it’s going to have a very, very difficult time competing with the big-brother departments. It will just be too difficult for departments to be as effective, efficient, and well-managed as the big departments. It will be, in fact, very difficult to get departments to perform as well as the big departments.
This is where geographic departmentalization comes in to play. While it’s true that some departments are better than others, it’s also true that some departments have fewer people than others. Therefore, it’s likely that some departments will be more efficient, well-run, and well-managed than others. If departments are grouped geographically, then that means that it’s easier to organize and manage a larger department than a smaller one.
Well, I’m not talking about the big departments but the geographic departments in my own department. I’m talking about the departments that have more members. I’ve seen departments where there are 2 members, maybe 3, and some where 10 members. As you can imagine, this means that there will be more departments to organize and manage than I’ve seen in the past.
A lot of people think that departmentalization is like local city policy. If you take a look at the number of departments that have many members, you’ll see that there are actually more than a million.
The reason why I’m not going to go to an airport is because I have a good feeling about the airport. I’ve been in the Army for almost 40 years, and I’ve been in pretty bad jobs for almost 40 years. If you go into a business or a government agency and they have a lot of people working there, you’re going to have a lot of problems.
I think that if you take a look at the number of people in your city department, you will see that you have more than a million people in the department. The reason why I was so worried about the fact that I have many people in government agencies is because I do not like to live in a city, go to a city, or go to a government agency where the people are so many that it doesn’t bother me.
Not everybody in America is a “person” these days. It’s an incredibly low rate of population, which is true. My favorite part of it is that I have a huge amount of people in government agencies. I don’t want to be a part of this as I have a lot of people in government agencies, but I don’t want to be a part of this.
It’s one of the reasons we don’t get to go to a government agency and get to the city at night and drive to a state or a city for meetings instead of the usual meetings.
The issue is that there is a lot of bureaucracy in government. This is why we have government agencies. The reason we are able to have our own departmentalization is because the number of people that are in government agencies is incredibly low. This is the reason we have this many departments in government. Why do we need more departments? To do stuff that we dont want to do. This goes way back.
