I am not an economist. In this case, I’m just an American businessman with too little time for such things. However, I do believe that many industries are oligopolies, or at least are so highly concentrated, that competition is reduced to a minimum. This is the most obvious factor in deciding on which industries to favor.

Many industries are oligopolies because they have lots of competitors. This can come in the form of a small number of firms who can dominate the marketplace. Smaller firms, as opposed to monopolies, have less competition because they have fewer competitors. Smaller firms can be more profitable since they can often sell goods and services with lower profit margins. This can be a big incentive for small firms to stay small. In other words, smaller firms have less competition in the marketplace.

I’ve been saying this for a couple years. And I still think it’s true. When you look at the number of firms in an industry, it’s much more likely that a small number of them are dominating the market. For the same reason that smaller firms can have lower profit margins, smaller firms often have less competition in the marketplace. If you have fewer competing firms, you have less choice. The bigger the number of firms in an industry, the less choice there is.

But the number of companies in an industry is much more constant.

It is true that the smaller number of firms is less likely to be the dominant firm. But it also means that smaller firms are more likely to be smaller than larger ones. Small firms are usually less profitable, so if they can’t win enough customers, they’ll fold. This idea is why there are fewer smaller firms in the food industry.

To some extent this also applies to the real estate industry, as our study of the Fortune 500 found that most of the very small firms are probably not even real estate companies in the strictest sense, but small agencies that are in the middle of selling property and are not actually involved in the real estate market.

But it is also true that the world of the big companies tends to be small. For example, the big banks are not small, because they are not owned by large corporations. So the idea that there are several small firms in the world is a bit like saying that the big banks are not small because they are not owned by big corporations.

If you go to a website and search for “how to get a house in a certain class?” you get a list of thousands of listings in which you have to buy a house. You can’t get a house in a certain class without going into a lot of different classes.

There is an interesting parallel between those big companies that have only 1, 2, or 3 companies within that same industry and the small companies that are all owned by the same corporation. Big companies tend to be more hierarchical, because they tend to have a higher degree of control through stock ownership. But small companies are more decentralized and less hierarchical. When you get up-front about your small company, you are able to take more control over your future.

You can create a company that has many smaller companies and one or two smaller companies and build a company that has a few more smaller companies. If you have to build a company to build a company to build a company to make it big, you can’t build a company that has many smaller companies, because you can’t build a company that has many smaller companies.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here