suppose the cost of producing a new version of the product is 5% of the positive profit, but the sale of the old version is 50% of the negative profit.

it should be at least twice as much a negative as a positive. If we have a positive profit, we should be able to sell it at a loss, and if we have a negative profit, then we should be able to sell it for a profit.

Let’s call this “positive accounting profit” and “negative economic profit.” The math for this is simple. The cost of producing the new version is 5 of the positive profit, plus the cost of the old version minus the profit of the sale of the old version (we’ll give it an arbitrary amount of $10). But the cost of the old version is 50 of the negative profit, so we should get 0.5 of a positive profit from the old version.

Now, lets change the formula.

So, the new version costs 5 times as much to produce as the old version. But, the cost of the old version is 50 times as much to produce. We should have an extra 5 of negative profit.

The old profit formula is a bit more complicated. What happens is that the positive profit gets spread across two sections. First, the cost of the old version. This costs 5 times as much to produce as the new version. Second, the profit you make after selling the old version. This costs 50 times as much to produce as the new version. But the old version still costs 50 times as much to produce so the total profit is still 50.

As you can probably guess, I am not a fan of this form of profit formula. It’s confusing and it doesn’t make much sense. But it is true. The old formula would have you think the profit is going to be 5, but it actually is 5 plus 50. The reason is that the old formula is really a cost of production formula. The profit on the old version is really 5, as well as 50. The new formula shows the actual profit.

This is the old formula that goes into the profit formula for the new version. The new formula shows the actual profit that you will make if you actually do what you have to do. Of course, the old version will show the actual profit. Thats why the old formula is flawed, because it will show you a profit that is 50 times higher than the actual profit you will make.

The new formula is also flawed, because it will show the actual profit that you will make, because you already have a profit that is 50 times higher than the actual profit you will make.