The manager is responsible for the quality of the worker’s performance, but should not be held responsible for the worker’s performance. The manager should have the authority to control the behavior of the workers.

The manager is responsible for the quality of the workers performance, but should not be held responsible for the workers performance. The manager should have the authority to control the behavior of the workers.

The manager is responsible for the quality of the workers performance, but should not be held responsible for the workers performance. The manager is responsible for the quality of the workers performance, but should not be held responsible for the workers performance. The manager is responsible for the quality of the workers performance, but should not be held responsible for the workers performance. The managers responsibility is to use the workers best efforts, and should not be held responsible for the workers performance.

The control model says that managers should hold their workers responsible for the quality of their work. Although managers should do their own job well, they should not be held responsible for the quality of the worker’s performance. That doesn’t mean that the managers can’t be held responsible for the quality of a worker’s performance. The manager’s duty is to use the workers best efforts and is not held responsible for the worker’s performance.

The bosses should be held accountable for their performance. If they don’t do their job well, they should be held accountable for their performance.

One way to think about this is that the manager should be accountable for: their own performance, but also for the workers performance. The manager should be held accountable for the workers overall performance, but they should not be held responsible for the workers performance. I think this is a really good way to think about it and it really does make sense. When the manager is holding the workers accountable for their performance and they are failing, they should be held accountable for their own performance.

This is what I’ve always wondered, what happens when the manager can’t hold the workers accountable? Well if they are failing, it may be because they aren’t doing their job. If they are not doing their job, then maybe it’s because they are not doing their job, or maybe they are doing it poorly. Either way it seems like a problem for the manager to be holding the workers responsible for their own performance.

In my experience, managers are generally not held accountable for their performance. But if they are and they are not, it may be because they are not doing their job. If they are not doing their job, it may be because they are doing it poorly. Either way it seems like a problem for the manager to be holding the workers responsible for their own performance.

The manager can be held responsible for their own performance. If the manager is responsible for their own performance, then it is not the manager’s fault that the workers are not doing their job. But you can’t blame the workers for being unable to do their job. To blame the workers for being unable to do their job is to blame the manager for not doing their job.

If the manager is trying to hold the workers responsible for their own performance, then that manager is NOT doing his job. To blame the workers for not doing their job would be to blame the manager for not doing his job.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here